The author is alive and well and living somewhere west of the Greenwich meridian.
 
Google
Long Dark Tea-Time Web
Site hosted by DreamHost
 
Archives
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
<< current
 
Tea-Time Feeds
Atom feed Atom feed
Subscribe with Bloglines Bloglines subscribe
Add to Yahoo MyYahoo subscribe
 
All your links are belong to us
Chicken or Beef?
eAsylum.net
Hateful Things
KnowProSE
K'vitsh
The Long Dark Tech-time of the Soul
The Mad Prophet Blog
Meg Does Blogs
Net Politik
Rush Limbaughtomy the Dittohead Recovery Site
South Knox Bubba
 
Rolling, rolling, rolling
Alternet.org
Angry Bear
Arianna's Blog
The Big Picture
Curry Blog
General Glut's Globblog
GuvWurld
In These Times
It's Still The Economy Stupid
Let's run the numbers
Tufte's Economics Classes Blog

SF  Bay Blogger
 
Douglas Adams
1952/3/11 - 2001/5/11

DNA Home Page
Wikipedia Entry
The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul Novel
H2G2
 
StatCounter:
SiteMeter:
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License

The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul
Miscellaneous ramblings written as my soul endures a long dark tea-time
 
Friday, October 14, 2005  
People, corporations, what's the difference?

Here's a technology story that belongs on this blog. Coursey believes that prosecuting all people involved in corporate fraud, rather than just the top guys will help stamp it out. Big fines and taking out the top executives just doesn't work. While it may be a fine idea I think he has forgotten about corporate personhood and its death grip on modern society. Corporations just wont stand for it as it weakens their viability, people just wouldn't want to work for a corporation if they thought they could be liable for every single mistake they or the corporation makes in day to day business. The "I was just following orders" argument will be used. People will not and cannot be expected to know about the legality of everything they are told to do.

Even if you can single out all those individuals who were demonstrably responsible and culpable in some corporate fraud, the reality is that corporations have this funny way of making it worth people's while to do anyway. The benefit nearly always outwieghs the risk to both the corporation and the individuals. The risk of being caught, being fined, being thrown in jail are just the cost of doing business. Dodgy doings in businesses attract dodgy dealers with questionable ethics and those with squeaky clean ethics will just go elsewhere.

Predictably I belief the real solution is to abolish corporate personhood, and let government treat incorporation as a privilege, not a right. This will give the government sufficient power to investigate and punish corporations, with the ultimate threat of revoking their corporate charter. There are good many people behind the idea of a "three strikes" law for corporate fraud, the problem is almost every major US corporation would have to have its corporate charter revoked at the moment. But going forward, it might prompt some alternate thinking when the executives are next contemplating fraud. It would give shareholders the ultimate incentive to pay attention to who is running their company and vote for executives with squeaky clean ethics and a clean pasts to ensure their corporation doesn't sent to the firing squad for corporate fraud.

10/14/2005 11:54:00 AM 0 comments

0 Comments:

Post a Comment