The author is alive and well and living somewhere west of the Greenwich meridian.
 
Google
Long Dark Tea-Time Web
Site hosted by DreamHost
 
Archives
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
<< current
 
Tea-Time Feeds
Atom feed Atom feed
Subscribe with Bloglines Bloglines subscribe
Add to Yahoo MyYahoo subscribe
 
All your links are belong to us
Chicken or Beef?
eAsylum.net
Hateful Things
KnowProSE
K'vitsh
The Long Dark Tech-time of the Soul
The Mad Prophet Blog
Meg Does Blogs
Net Politik
Rush Limbaughtomy the Dittohead Recovery Site
South Knox Bubba
 
Rolling, rolling, rolling
Alternet.org
Angry Bear
Arianna's Blog
The Big Picture
Curry Blog
General Glut's Globblog
GuvWurld
In These Times
It's Still The Economy Stupid
Let's run the numbers
Tufte's Economics Classes Blog

SF  Bay Blogger
 
Douglas Adams
1952/3/11 - 2001/5/11

DNA Home Page
Wikipedia Entry
The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul Novel
H2G2
 
StatCounter:
SiteMeter:
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License

The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul
Miscellaneous ramblings written as my soul endures a long dark tea-time
 
Monday, August 29, 2005  
Another losing strategy from the left

It just fills me with sadness that the left (if the Democrats can still call themselves that) has nothing better to say about soaring gas prices than "unleash the strategic petroleum reserves", but that's exactly what they are saying:

"Skyrocketing gas prices have tipped consumers upside down this summer and to protect our economy, the president should act immediately to tap the SPR," Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York said.

What is more it is clear they are going to use energy costs as their number two weapon against Bush come next election time, number two next to the war on Iraq that is. What is worse is they don't even have a good story on Iraq either - they didn't have one last election ("more of the same but we'll do it better") and they sure haven't expressed one this time around. Much as the majority of Americans now seem to think Bush is doing poorly in Iraq I reckon when the question is posed "Should we pull out of Iraq" the majority will still say no. Lets face it, the stigma of America being labeled a bunch of quitters or losers will just sting too bad. Even if you think that's not how such a move would be seen by any other than the insurgents in Iraq then you can bet that is how the Republicans will frame the argument, it'll go something like this:

Do you want to America to be seen as a nation of quitters? A nation of people who can't finish a job? Do you want to lose the war on terrorism? Do you want to admit all those lives were lost in vain and all those billions of your money just went down the drain? Do you want to explain this to your children? How you were part of generation Q, Q for quitters? If so then go ahead, vote for the Democrats.

Which leads me back to the number two argument against the Republicans. Instead of some pathetic call to unleash the strategic petroleum reserves the need to just come clean - Americas addiction to oil, our foreign policies, our entire lifestyle has put us at the mercy of foreign powers, to the point where they say "Boo" and we jump out of our seats and run for our guns. They need to tell it like it is, oil is Americas Achilles heel that is destabilizing the entire planet both politically and environmentally. Until America decides to come clean, kick the habit and win the war on energy independence nothing will change for the better in our lifetimes or our children's lifetimes.

Damnit, Democrats just have to give America a vision for a better future - one with energy independence. A future where you can flip a light switch, travel to work and put food on the table without worrying about where the oil to make it all happen is coming from. I mean come on, this huge nation, with massive natural resources - enough wind energy in the Dakotas alone to power us twice over, massive areas of land with virtually constant sunshine for solar power, and massive over production of grains from farms that could be busy producing bio-mass fuels. Just what is our problem? Have we no guts for making the switch, have we no taste for the glory of energy independence, are we afraid of failing, are we too soft, too bloated, too lazy to bother trying?

All the Democrats have to do is stand up and make a JFK "We choose to go to the moon" style proclamation" and get on with it. Of course it wont happen "by the end of this decade" but there's no reason why it couldn't happen within our (genX-ers) lifetimes, and certainly by the end of next decade. If you're going to blow $200 billion on something don't piss it away killing people overseas, burning oil overseas, blowing things up overseas - spend it on industries at home, giving people jobs at home, giving people hope for the future. Just that announcement alone will probably knock a few bucks of the price of gas as all the oil investors start panicking and dumping their long term gas futures. Democrats need to demonstrate that it takes more to be a world leader than to just carry a big stick and say "We are the world leaders!". You actually need to lead - lead by example and that means we have to get off our asses and just do it.

But you know what, I don't think it will happen that way. The Democrats are still basically slaves to corporate America just as the Republicans are their love child. Corporate America just doesn't want us in control of our own destiny, it wants to control it even though economics says that we should be in control of them. No its actually more convenient to rule from the position where we the people (consumers) are weak and afraid, and the government is there to protect us. If everyone had their own power at home and we didn't have troops all over the world defending oil under someone else's desserts then what would we need that huge military and oil centric economy for? Wouldn't the government have to get on with real business like solving issues of poverty, crime and actually educating its people? Perish the thought, that's much too hard! After all the Europeans have spent the last fifty years working on those issues and still can't get it right - fighting wars against the boogie man you can't see is so much easier.

8/29/2005 11:21:00 AM 0 comments

0 Comments:

Post a Comment