The author is alive and well and living somewhere west of the Greenwich meridian.
 
Google
Long Dark Tea-Time Web
Site hosted by DreamHost
 
Archives
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
<< current
 
Tea-Time Feeds
Atom feed Atom feed
Subscribe with Bloglines Bloglines subscribe
Add to Yahoo MyYahoo subscribe
 
All your links are belong to us
Chicken or Beef?
eAsylum.net
Hateful Things
KnowProSE
K'vitsh
The Long Dark Tech-time of the Soul
The Mad Prophet Blog
Meg Does Blogs
Net Politik
Rush Limbaughtomy the Dittohead Recovery Site
South Knox Bubba
 
Rolling, rolling, rolling
Alternet.org
Angry Bear
Arianna's Blog
The Big Picture
Curry Blog
General Glut's Globblog
GuvWurld
In These Times
It's Still The Economy Stupid
Let's run the numbers
Tufte's Economics Classes Blog

SF  Bay Blogger
 
Douglas Adams
1952/3/11 - 2001/5/11

DNA Home Page
Wikipedia Entry
The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul Novel
H2G2
 
StatCounter:
SiteMeter:
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License

The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul
Miscellaneous ramblings written as my soul endures a long dark tea-time
 
Thursday, July 21, 2005  
Yo!

Well of course I had to go and Google open source religion only to find that according to Wikipedia since 1998 a group of people calling themselves Yoans have been working on the concept. I have to say, after a cursory inspection of their website I'm generally in tune with their concepts.

I'm not sure I really like the way they have co-opted (perhaps recycled is a better description) terminology like god (it's us stupid), heaven (only to be found on earth if we can make it happen) and saints (Saint Albert and Saint Issac to name a few). I assume the intention is to use terms that are instantly familiar to a wider audience making Yoism easier to get your head around. Too some it may smack of Republican co-opting of phrases like "clear skies" and "healthy forests" and "no child left behind" to be something completely contrary to the usual interpretation. That's not entirely fair since the Yoan versions of God and heaven are more like a distant cousins to the mainstream ones than the antithesis.

But I do think they carry the Christian analogies a little too far at times, such as in their "Book of Yo" where the section Reclaiming GOD "A story of creation" reads more like a parody of the bible, which is somewhat disingenuous. Actually I'm pretty sure it is supposed to read like a parody of the bible but it'll take a pretty enlightened non-Yoan mind to see the humor clearly for what it is. None the less reading that would probably alienate Christian readers who would find it blasphemous - if they hadn't already written off the concept of Yo as worshiping a false idol.

Actually when I can get my head around the terminology it actually makes a whole lot of sense as a way of life and of rationalizing my vestiges of early Christian (well Anglican Church of England which is about as wishy-washy non-committal Christian as you can make it) and then later scientific upbringing at the Church of Physics (aka Oxford University School of Science). Is that useful to me? To have a "religion" (as opposed to "faith") to identify with? Well as Agent J found out yesterday sometimes people are just too damned nosy about what religion you are and what church you go to. To say I'm Yoan would at the very least solve that problem although I might hazard a guess it would generate more questions than it answers.

As best I can tell the Yoans are not up to much these days. They got some publicity at the start of 2004 but there's been very little activity from them since. However another group called the Universalists Movement seems to be getting some weight behind it, a write up in the New York Times certainly helped. Universalists put ones personally discovered truths first, believing that only you can interpret the truths you discover in life. Their main goal is the pursuit of truths through personal experience. You are free to believe in God with a capital 'G' so long as you are doing so based on your own the truths, not simply because you have faith that God exists, i.e. that someone just told you so.

So while Universalism can encompass people who believe in God and describe themselves as a "religion" its on quite strict terms. Outside of those terms they quite clearly declare themselves as anti-faith, and hence find it abhorrent that faith is being used via government to define and control personal freedoms of the populace at large. The Universalists don't declare themselves as Democrats in the US political arena - they believe that many libertarians and hence many Republicans should support their goal of opposing faith based religions and its influence on the populace at large.

I'll be interested to see if the Universalists just fizzle out like the Yoans, or if they can actually find themselves attracting disenchanted people of faith. Both these religions, without the promise of afterlife or the belief in some omnipotent but essentially good supreme being, they face an uphill battle for winning the hearts and minds of mainstream believers. They have little to ofer those that would traditional use a religion as a catch-all comforter for those spritually cold and bleak days when you just want to curl up and be kept warm by the thought that God is good and God is right there up on his cloud looking out for you*.

* Even if he did just smite your car, your home, your health, or your family

7/21/2005 09:49:00 AM 0 comments

0 Comments:

Post a Comment