The author is alive and well and living somewhere west of the Greenwich meridian.
 
Google
Long Dark Tea-Time Web
Site hosted by DreamHost
 
Archives
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
<< current
 
Tea-Time Feeds
Atom feed Atom feed
Subscribe with Bloglines Bloglines subscribe
Add to Yahoo MyYahoo subscribe
 
All your links are belong to us
Chicken or Beef?
eAsylum.net
Hateful Things
KnowProSE
K'vitsh
The Long Dark Tech-time of the Soul
The Mad Prophet Blog
Meg Does Blogs
Net Politik
Rush Limbaughtomy the Dittohead Recovery Site
South Knox Bubba
 
Rolling, rolling, rolling
Alternet.org
Angry Bear
Arianna's Blog
The Big Picture
Curry Blog
General Glut's Globblog
GuvWurld
In These Times
It's Still The Economy Stupid
Let's run the numbers
Tufte's Economics Classes Blog

SF  Bay Blogger
 
Douglas Adams
1952/3/11 - 2001/5/11

DNA Home Page
Wikipedia Entry
The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul Novel
H2G2
 
StatCounter:
SiteMeter:
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License

The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul
Miscellaneous ramblings written as my soul endures a long dark tea-time
 
Friday, March 25, 2005  
Voting with your feet: WalMart and WarMart

Today I listened to radio show that was discussing the recent California court decision that basically said, environmental impact reports must consider the economic impact of new development. It also came down against doing two developments simultaneously and having impact reports for each that do not consider the other.

Actually for an public radio show talking about WalMart and big-box development in general it was surprisingly calm and balance, even the attorney who represents big-box stores seemed to have her leash on. In fact I've heard Ms. Shimco represent retail developers in real life in a local situation and she was being very calm and restrained in her comments, as was the economics professor from San Francisco.

One comment that came up time and time again was "well if you don't like WalMart or any other retailer then they should just vote with their feet and not shop there". As they say, no one is forcing people to shop at WalMart. Well that's true up to a point - right up to the point where there are no other stores to shop at and you have to shop at WalMart or move somewhere else. Which brings one to the second objection to saying people should vote with their feet: it assumes a well informed voting population. Basic economics says people make "the economic choice" but they do so with the information they have at hand. What if there are hidden externalities that they don't know about?

On a different aspect of "voting with their feet" it seems American men and women are failing to point their feet in the direction of the local Armed Forces recruiting center. Why not? Well naturally Americans are just making the economic choice again since many, if not most recruits join primarily for financial reasons. Now they are starting to realize there are a few hidden costs to signing up - like maybe actually being put in harms way and dying. That's not going to do much good for your future income potential. Or perhaps realizing that the "seeing the world" promise isn't quite ringing so true any more when all you're likely to see is the inside of a Hummer for the next two years.

I don't blame people for making the economic choice, but just remember when the supply of willing and able has run out there are interventionists in high places with one word on their minds and a big stick behind their backs. Does anyone feel the draft?

3/25/2005 10:06:00 AM 0 comments

0 Comments:

Post a Comment