The author is alive and well and living somewhere west of the Greenwich meridian.
 
Google
Long Dark Tea-Time Web
Site hosted by DreamHost
 
Archives
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
<< current
 
Tea-Time Feeds
Atom feed Atom feed
Subscribe with Bloglines Bloglines subscribe
Add to Yahoo MyYahoo subscribe
 
All your links are belong to us
Chicken or Beef?
eAsylum.net
Hateful Things
KnowProSE
K'vitsh
The Long Dark Tech-time of the Soul
The Mad Prophet Blog
Meg Does Blogs
Net Politik
Rush Limbaughtomy the Dittohead Recovery Site
South Knox Bubba
 
Rolling, rolling, rolling
Alternet.org
Angry Bear
Arianna's Blog
The Big Picture
Curry Blog
General Glut's Globblog
GuvWurld
In These Times
It's Still The Economy Stupid
Let's run the numbers
Tufte's Economics Classes Blog

SF  Bay Blogger
 
Douglas Adams
1952/3/11 - 2001/5/11

DNA Home Page
Wikipedia Entry
The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul Novel
H2G2
 
StatCounter:
SiteMeter:
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License

The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul
Miscellaneous ramblings written as my soul endures a long dark tea-time
 
Saturday, January 24, 2004  
Earth is room enough

A while ago, on a plane to the UK, I was wondering just how much land there is per person on the planet Earth. The Earth's surface area is about 5500 trillion square feet, but only 30% of that is land, and of the land only 30% has farmable topsoil (the rest is snow, mountains or desert) hence approximately 10% of the Earth's surface is farmable land. So by my calculations, if the Earth's seven billion inhabitants all spread out evenly across that land we'd each have about 78,600 square feet to call our own*. That is a square about 93 yards on each side, or 1.8 acres, or around-about a US city block.

Not exactly roomy, but then you should allow for a reasonable amount of cohabitation of plots via vertical development and simple sharing due to the existance of families. Also there is bound to be some spreading out into some of the 90% non-farmable areas - it might be an idea to keep the farmable area for farming. All things considered it is clear there is going to be a lot more land available per family, probably five to ten acres. But the question is, just how much land does each person need to keep themselves feed and watered?

Another way to think of these figures is to compare them to a city dweller living alone in a two bedroom apartment of 700 square feet. Effectively they using 1% of the land that is theoretically available and that's without considering vertical stacking of apartments in a city. Its likely most industrialized cities have a density of people that is ten to one hundred times higher than single storey developments would yield. Thus you city dwellers are probably using one-thousandth or less of the land available. Since the majority of the worlds inhabitants now live in cities its clear there is still a lot of room out there.

Of course I'm not condoning over population, just trying to get some sense of perspective. What would be nice of course, was if the majority, if not all of the current seven billion people were actually out of poverty, able to get critical health-care, education, enough food to eat and clean water to drink. For well over a billion even getting a simple light after dark is a big problem of the day.

*Yes I know these calculations don't leave any room for farmable land that is used by parks, wilderness, uninhabited or for infrastructure. If you want divide my final figures by two.

1/24/2004 06:05:00 PM