The author is alive and well and living somewhere west of the Greenwich meridian.
 
Google
Long Dark Tea-Time Web
Site hosted by DreamHost
 
Archives
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
<< current
 
Tea-Time Feeds
Atom feed Atom feed
Subscribe with Bloglines Bloglines subscribe
Add to Yahoo MyYahoo subscribe
 
All your links are belong to us
Chicken or Beef?
eAsylum.net
Hateful Things
KnowProSE
K'vitsh
The Long Dark Tech-time of the Soul
The Mad Prophet Blog
Meg Does Blogs
Net Politik
Rush Limbaughtomy the Dittohead Recovery Site
South Knox Bubba
 
Rolling, rolling, rolling
Alternet.org
Angry Bear
Arianna's Blog
The Big Picture
Curry Blog
General Glut's Globblog
GuvWurld
In These Times
It's Still The Economy Stupid
Let's run the numbers
Tufte's Economics Classes Blog

SF  Bay Blogger
 
Douglas Adams
1952/3/11 - 2001/5/11

DNA Home Page
Wikipedia Entry
The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul Novel
H2G2
 
StatCounter:
SiteMeter:
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License

The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul
Miscellaneous ramblings written as my soul endures a long dark tea-time
 
Saturday, September 13, 2003  

Critical mass for cars

Okay it sounds like a stupid idea fresh from Detroit. But hear me out. Yes, Critical Mass for cars turns the thing on its head a bit, but its nothing at all about bikes, you do it on the freeways where bikes aren't even allowed. What you do is get a hundred or more hybrid and fuel efficient car owners to all drive together in one of those classic freeway packs. Keep them all close enough to stop anyone passing, and best of all - drive at the spped limit. There's one thing about all SUV owners, no matter what the traffic speed, they always hate to behind someones car, they love to pick up the cellphone, bitch about the traffic and then pass, weave and get ahead. During commute hours a pack of small, fuel efficient cars that they can see way past, but cannot actually pass will drive them crazy.

Thanks to my friend Jimmy for putting the germ of the idea in my head. His point was that if SUVs want to enjoy the tax and fuel efficiency loopholes assoicated with trucks then they should be jammed into the truck lane with the real trucks. I know this wont really work because they are actually exploiting tax loopholes of commercial vehicles. A small modification might be to tighten the loophole so that a large percentage, if not all, of the mileage has to be for legitimate and documented commercial purposes. Otherwise you have to pay over the odds in tax for your vehicle, or find one that is fuel efficient. What is unfair with that? Californians are saying its unfair to hike taxes for cars because it hurts the poorest in the state, however who can argue that hiking SUV taxes way up would hurt the poor? What poor person that they are trying to protect can afford to run a $20-30K+ SUV that's probably costing $0.20 a mile in fuel alone? Why not tax fuel inefficient luxury cars to subsidize fuel efficient economy cars? Why not heavily tax second, third and fourth cars not used soley for purposes of work, educational, health and social care? This is as fair as the mortgage interest tax relief rules that apply to houses.

My point is there are plenty of ways to raise taxes fairly, its never just the simple black and white options that politicians present to us. After all when it comes to cutting taxes there's never an shortage of interesting and clever ways to slice and dice tax regulations to open up a hole big enough to shove a few trillion dollars through, so why not the other way around?

In the mean time I can't wait to get my hybrid car and start organizing Critical Mass events all around the Bay Area. Power to the fuel efficient! Death to the gas guzzling behemoths!

9/13/2003 02:22:19 PM