The author is alive and well and living somewhere west of the Greenwich meridian.
 
Google
Long Dark Tea-Time Web
Site hosted by DreamHost
 
Archives
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
<< current
 
Tea-Time Feeds
Atom feed Atom feed
Subscribe with Bloglines Bloglines subscribe
Add to Yahoo MyYahoo subscribe
 
All your links are belong to us
Chicken or Beef?
eAsylum.net
Hateful Things
KnowProSE
K'vitsh
The Long Dark Tech-time of the Soul
The Mad Prophet Blog
Meg Does Blogs
Net Politik
Rush Limbaughtomy the Dittohead Recovery Site
South Knox Bubba
 
Rolling, rolling, rolling
Alternet.org
Angry Bear
Arianna's Blog
The Big Picture
Curry Blog
General Glut's Globblog
GuvWurld
In These Times
It's Still The Economy Stupid
Let's run the numbers
Tufte's Economics Classes Blog

SF  Bay Blogger
 
Douglas Adams
1952/3/11 - 2001/5/11

DNA Home Page
Wikipedia Entry
The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul Novel
H2G2
 
StatCounter:
SiteMeter:
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License

The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul
Miscellaneous ramblings written as my soul endures a long dark tea-time
 
Friday, July 18, 2003  

Homeland security for dummies

GWB is busy fending off assertions that he deliberately included a falsified claim about Iraq and nuclear weapons in the state of the nation. That's a calculated lie to the nation, one far more heinous than Clinton's "I did not have sex with that woman" claim, and far more worthy of impeachment. He can shovel the blame on all his advisors all he wants, but for just once Bush she take the pie square in the face and admit, "mia culpa".

In the mean time, the department of Homeland Security is awarding a huge contact to Microsoft. So don't they know anything about security? Did they really buy Microsoft's claims that Windows Server 2003 was invulnerable. They of all people should know these are as good as Oracle's still advertised claim that Oracle Server is "uncrackable" inspite of it being cracked the very day it was launched. So just to prove the point, for the clinically dumb, today's press release shows Windows Server 2003 has had its first critical security flaw which came close on the heals of four moderate security flaws which were only moderate because they weren't apparent in the default configuration. That's almost like saying a critical flaw in a cars engine isn't critical because the default car configuration as supplied by the dealer is with the engine off...

Commenting on the bug Microsoft could only say "we knew it was coming at some point". So, I'll tell you the day someone hijacks all the Microsoft PCs used by the Department of Homeland Security and turns them into a porn distribution system will be the day I post here "we knew it was coming at some point". I'll also tell you for free, right now, ahead of the time, that... Someone in the government should be running Microsoft through the grinder for equiping every US home and business with one, two, or many more PCs that run an OS that is demonstrably insecure, does not include easy to use security controls, and includes dozens of technologies that are known and unprotected vectors for thousands of known and unknown viruses, worms, trojans, and other malfeasant code that can hijack and disable an US computer in seconds.

7/18/2003 10:26:10 AM